← Back to Catalog

Hallucination

A condition in which model-generated content can appear plausible yet is incorrect, unsupported, or inconsistent when assessed against relevant evidence, supplied context, or external facts.

Example

A model invents a paper title and author, then describes supposed findings as if the paper were real.

Distinctions and cautions

Hallucination does not refer to every type of AI error. Some literature separates inconsistencies with external facts from failures to remain faithful to the provided source or context. Factuality, Faithfulness, and Groundedness are related but not fully synonymous.

Open questions and cautions

There is no single definition of the scope of “Hallucination,” or single causal classification of how it arises, established across the research field.

Terminology note

“Confabulation” and “Fabrication” are sometimes used as related terms, but this Catalog does not currently treat them as exact synonyms for Hallucination.

Evidence

View evidence →

Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation

Title
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Author / organization
Ji et al.
Year
2023
Source type / publication status
ACM Computing Surveys major peer-reviewed survey; published
Supported concepts / claim context
Hallucination terminology/taxonomy; factuality/faithfulness boundary.
Scope and limitations
A major survey whose boundaries are deliberately broad to cover usage across tasks.
Access / version note
Published survey.
Recorded official URL / DOI / identifier
DOI: 10.1145/3571730 (DOI resolver)

On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization

Title
On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization
Author / organization
Maynez et al.
Year
2020
Source type / publication status
ACL peer-reviewed research; published
Supported concepts / claim context
Faithfulness, Factuality, Hallucination boundary.
Scope and limitations
Focused on summarization, but provides foundational evidence for the source-versus-world distinction.
Access / version note
Published ACL.
Recorded official URL / DOI / identifier
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.173 (DOI resolver)

Evaluating large language models for accuracy incentivizes hallucinations

Title
Evaluating large language models for accuracy incentivizes hallucinations
Author / organization
Kalai et al.
Year
2026
Source type / publication status
Nature peer-reviewed research; published
Supported concepts / claim context
Accuracy, Abstention, Hallucination; evaluation incentives.
Scope and limitations
Formal model and selected frontier-model case study. Utility depends on the use case.
Access / version note
Published Nature article.
Recorded official URL / DOI / identifier
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10549-w (DOI resolver)

Detecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy

Title
Detecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy
Author / organization
Farquhar et al.
Year
2024
Source type / publication status
Nature peer-reviewed research; published
Supported concepts / claim context
Uncertainty Estimation, Abstention, Hallucination.
Scope and limitations
Requires sampling and clustering by semantic equivalence; cost and applicability depend on the setting.
Access / version note
Published Nature article.
Recorded official URL / DOI / identifier
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07421-0 (DOI resolver)

Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models

Title
Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models
Author / organization
Dhuliawala et al.
Year
2024
Source type / publication status
Findings ACL peer-reviewed research; published
Supported concepts / claim context
Verification; mitigation of hallucination.
Scope and limitations
Self-/model-based verification does not guarantee external ground truth.
Access / version note
Published ACL Findings.
Recorded official URL / DOI / identifier
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.212 (DOI resolver)

Verify with Caution: The Pitfalls of Relying on Imperfect Factuality Metrics

Title
Verify with Caution: The Pitfalls of Relying on Imperfect Factuality Metrics
Author / organization
Godbole & Jia
Year
2025
Source type / publication status
Findings ACL peer-reviewed research; published
Supported concepts / claim context
Limits of verification; disagreement among factuality metrics.
Scope and limitations
Depends on the factuality metrics and datasets studied.
Access / version note
Published ACL Findings.
Recorded official URL / DOI / identifier
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1175 (DOI resolver)

Astute RAG: Overcoming Imperfect Retrieval Augmentation and Knowledge Conflicts for Large Language Models

Title
Astute RAG: Overcoming Imperfect Retrieval Augmentation and Knowledge Conflicts for Large Language Models
Author / organization
Wang et al.
Year
2025
Source type / publication status
ACL peer-reviewed research; published
Supported concepts / claim context
Retrieval Failure, RAG, Knowledge Conflict.
Scope and limitations
Controlled RAG analyses; no universal extrapolation to all retrievers or domains.
Access / version note
Published ACL.
Recorded official URL / DOI / identifier
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1476 (DOI resolver)